: fF
Jase syoujune Sees
™ aT [Sey
Cay
Fit &, COURTHOUSE ROAL, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA, 22204-2480
BC
Docket No: 02788-14
22 October 2014
pear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 22 October 2014. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with ail
material submitted in support thereof, your navel record, and
applicable statuces, regulations, and policies.
ul and conscientious consideration of she entire
th
ee ke =
record, the Board found =he evidence submitted was insufiicient
to establish the existence of propable material error or
‘BEter care
.
injustice.
You enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active
duty on 17 January 2012. You were recommended for an entry
level separation. Subsequently, you were notified of pending
administrative separation by reason of performance and conduct
for lack of reasonable effort. The discharge authority approved
this recommendation and directed separation with an
uncharacterized entry level separation, and on 9 February 2012,
you were so discharged and assigned an RE-3F reentry code.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your desire to serve in the military. Nevertheless, the Board
concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant relief in
your case because you were assigned the most favorable reentry
code for your situation. accordingly, your application has been
denied.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence within one year from tne @ete Si the Bosre's
decision. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by
_the Board prior to making its decision in your case. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
‘regularity attaches.to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of
probable material error or injustice.
Sinceyely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Puecutive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5739 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0669 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. However, the Board found those factors were insufficient to warrant any change in your reentry code, given your diagnosed condition, record of fraudulent entry and non- recommendation for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4531 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in “support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the .existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2910 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2014. -After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0277 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0109 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2014. The Board noted that an RE-3F is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of entry level performance and conduct during initial training. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2518-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11534 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2321-13
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in -support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, thé burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1636 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies-~ After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...